Charter Cable Payment

Payment agreements 06 September 2017

I' ve been in the charter business for over a year. As I arrived there, they permitted you to make payment agreements, and I always made them and kept my armomise to make payment. And then last month most of them cancelled the payment agreements. i believe how Charter should have penalized the folks who didn't keep their pledge to paying them, not the ones who kept theirs with them. that's completely unfiar and not right.

Charters must make that difference because it's completely unfair and not right, these payment agreements made it easier for everyone, you don't make any changes that work for the clients, just not right.

Spectrum asked a man to spend $133,000 on installing broadband in New York.

Whilst the wideband industries like to act as if the issue doesn't arise, there are innumerable places in America where wideband is still not widespread. FCC figures show that there is practically no high-speed wide-band rivalry. Giant companies like Verizon have almost given up fibre expansion and the modernisation of high-speed Internet (DSL) connections, giving cable companies like Charter Spectrum and Comcast a burgeoning edge across the country.

The FCC also indicates that about 28 million Americans, or about 8 per cent of the nation, do not have wireless connectivity. Because America's wideband coverage and map information are known to be horrible, the real numbers are likely to be much inferior. First-time homebuyers are often misinformed by Internet Service Providers that broad band is available at their new location.

These allegations are often supported by the FCC's wideband access card, which, despite its $300 million pricing and recent re-launch, still gives a dramatic overstating of wideband access, speed and the number of effective rivals in a given area. This is because it is built on imprecise 477 forms of information provided to the FCC by ISPs who have a legitimate interest in disguising the outages of the nation's broadband markets.

In spite of recurring promises of ISPs, customers often move into their new home or flat to find that they do not have access to high speed internet. Complaining to their cable companies, they are often said that laying the required coax cable (often a kilometer or less) will cause them to lose a small fortune. However, they will not be able to afford the costs of coax cable.

Previously and frequently notified by Internet Service Providers (ISPs) and the FCC that broad band is available at their new addresses, Internet subscribers are often notified after the move that the act of connection will now charge them $5,000, $10,000, $10,000, even up to $25,000. This is so menacing to the ISP that they have advocated the adoption of 21 states' protective legislation that prohibits such involvement in the EU.